A
QUESTION OF PAYMENT
"The
potential traitors are all patriots, the patriots all traitors.
The
seesaw of autocracy." (Lt. General al-Shazliy)
February 15:
Back at my desk at last, I began studying the outcome of the President's
sessions in the Kremlin. As well as confirming their obligations under
the October agreement, the Soviets had now also agreed to supply:
-200 T- 62s,
their latest and most powerful tanks; ten to come in March
1972 for
training, the rest before the end of 1972.
-20 TU-22
bombers (each with a payload of nine tons). Two could be delivered
in March,
the rest within the year.
-25 MIG-17s
to be delivered immediately.
-Electronic equipment
to upgrade our electronic capability.
The
Soviets had also promised they would help Egypt to manufacture its
own MIG-21MFs, construction to start in phases and be in full swing
by
1979.
February 18:
Marshal Grechko,
in Cairo again, this time for a three day official visit. We had military
discussions, but Grechko's
main purpose was political. The Soviets were trying to soften
Sadiq’s opposition to them. Grechko
failed.
At one meeting such rough words passed between them that the talks seemed
about to collapse. But other meetings followed. The two even dined privately
at Sahara City restaurant. I was invited to join them but declined. I thought
they needed as much privacy as possible if they were to resolve their differences.
But they could not. After Grechko departed
I had private words with Sadiq.
I found him as intransigent as ever. Nothing would budge him from his conviction
that the Soviet Union was not "sincere" in its cooperation
with us.
I
thought
this was naive. They were indispensable to us; but we were important to
them-as our problems in manning our own air defenses were at that moment
demonstrating.
The
story goes back to January 1970 when,
with our air defenses in ruins, President Nasir
had gone to Moscow to ask for Soviet help. The Soviets had sent two fighter
brigades and an air defense division. The deal had three main clauses.
The first was that Egypt would buy the equipment. Constitutionally,
the weapons would then be part of Egypt's own forces, merely operated
by friendly troops. The second was that Egypt would provide food
and field clothing for the crews and pay Moscow the equivalent of
their salaries in hard currency- 150 sterling a month for a soldier
and L. 170 sterling a month for an officer. The third stipulation
was that the Soviet personnel would be withdrawn as soon as Egypt
could train its own.
So
hectic was the expansion of our air defenses, however, that despite the
scale of our training program it was only by the spring
of 1972 that we had some spare manpower
to relieve part of the Soviet crews. At that point, of course, we wanted
to relieve the Soviet crews as soon as possible, partly to save hard currency,
partly for reasons of national pride. Sadiq
had written to Grechko,
requesting the withdrawal of 18 battalions of Soviet SAM crews.
Moscow
was dismayed. That was one reason why Grechko
had come to Cairo. He suspected Sadiq's
anti-Soviet stance was the root cause of the request. Even if that were
wrong, the Soviets still opposed any move which appeared to reduce their
presence in the area, a presence which had become a part of their global
strategy. President Richard Nixon
was due to visit Moscow in May. Withdrawal of the crews might weaken
Moscow's
hand at the summit. Grechko
wanted a compromise. I saw the episode as the clearest evidence of soviet
concern to keep our alliance in good order. Sadiq
would
not agree.
Sadiq
's
obsession with communism was another obstacle to my relationship with him,
as if we did not have enough problems on that score. In the New Year, Sadiq
had
made a direct assault on my role He announced that as minister of War he
was the only one entitled to make decisions. I should submit everything
to him.
"In that case,"
I replied, "what you need is a chef
de cabinet not a Chief of Staff of the
Armed Forces."
"Read that,"Sadiq
said,
handing me a sheet of paper, "you will see I am acting within my powers."
It was a presidential decree dating from Fawziy's
time as Minister of War, couched in vague terms but broadly giving the
Minister total discretion. I had no doubt that Fawziy
had drafted it and got it signed without any independent or contrary advice
having been sought. It is too frequent phenomenon in Egypt
that a man of power will tailor a law or a decree to his own ends and then
claim, virtuously, to be acting "in accordance with the law."
To
stave
off Sadiq's demands,
I set up a committee to examine the division of functions. Guwhar,
the chief of Organization, and General `Abd
al-Ghaniy al-Gamasiy, Chief of Operations,
were on it. The unanimous opinion was that the Minister should remain a
political figure, responsible for politico-military strategy but leaving
military decisions to the Chief of Staff.
To avert charges of self-aggrandizement I proposed this should bind only
our successors. Sadiq
refused to listen.
Increasingly,
the issue behind our dispute was how far Egypt's leadership would
let political considerations stand in the way of the nation's needs.
In public the leadership called for an all-out struggle against the enemy
and promised full support to the armed forces in that effort. In
private the leadership's paramount concern was to preserve a regime of
autocratic privilege, which it upheld by lying to its citizens and then
spying on them to see if they believed the lies. Even if the price were
the failure of our assault on the enemy, the regime was determined to keep
the armed forces subservient to that real, secret end.
The
T-62
tanks provided a classic example of this. From the President's February
visit we had learned that Moscow was to supply us with
200.
We had to plan, in advance, how best to absorb them.
February 26:
A meeting to settle the question. Sadiq
in the chair. The T-62s, with their 115mm guns, were so powerful
that, properly deployed, they could exert decisive influence on a battle.
I proposed they be allocated to our two armored divisions and kept in reserve
to deploy as and when the battle demanded. The Minister, along with Gamasiy
and Guwhar,
argued that they should replace the T-55s in our two independent
armored brigades. (The difference being that our armored divisions
functioned as independent battle formations; while the independent armored
brigades-independent, that is, of the rest of our armor-were used as support
formations.) The T-55s released from the brigades would
in turn replace the older T-34s in other formations. I urged this
would risk dissipating the potential impact of the T-62, especially
if the independent brigades were dispersed in battle, as they could well
be, to reinforce a variety of field formations. The Vice Minister, General
Hasan,
agreed with me.
February 27:
The meeting resumed, this time with Soviet advisers. Sadiq
sounded
my colleagues one by one. Hasan
had changed his views. I had not. Then the Soviet advisers spoke. They
all agreed with me. Sadiq,
displeased and with all his intelligence officer's antennae roused, turned
to the Senior Soviet Adviser, "I see," he said to General Okunev,
"you and General Shazliy are
in complete agreement."
The
tanks were allotted, as Sadiq had
decreed, to the 15th and 25th armored brigades.
His main reason, I discovered later, was that the regime had doubts --
no more. Just doubts about the loyalty of the brigadier commanding
one of the armored divisions and judged that 100
T-62s in his hands would be a risk to internal
security. (Since then, of course, the leadership
has changed its view of what is an acceptable opinion and what is not.
Now
the potential traitors are all patriots, the patriots all traitors. The
seesaw of autocracy.)
March 10:GeneralHasan
set off for Moscow, as usual, to sign the contracts for the equipment
agreed with Sadat in
February. He returned without having signed contracts for the promised
T-62s
and
TU-22s.
The
Soviets, he reported, were demanding payment in full and in hard currency.
We
were dumbfounded. Since President Nasir's
first arms deal in 1955, Moscow had granted Egypt the most
generous terms. We were charged half price. We were loaned the balance
at two percent interest a year. We could pay off the loan over 10-15 years
and in nonconvertible currency. Even at full price, Soviet equipment tends
to cost roughly half the price of its Western equivalent. The upshot was
that we were getting our arms at roughly one-quarter of their Western price,
payable in our own currency. (Examples: the MIG-21 was costing us
about E L.250,000 and the T-55 about EL.25,000, approximately
$365,500
dollars
and $36,765 dollars respectively. In now demanding payment in full
and in hard currency, the Soviets were thus effectively quadrupling their
prices to us and demanding cash on the barrelhead. That is how Western
governments operate. But it baffled us why the Soviets should have adopted
this position. They must know we could not afford it. Our only conclusion
was that they were hoping Libya or SaudiArabia would finance
us.
March 18: Sadiq
wasted no time. He called a meeting of the Armed Forces Supreme Council
with himself in the chair. His ostensible purpose was to deny rumors.
"There
are rumors," he said, "that there are differences between myself
and the Prime Minister, Dr. `Aziyz
Sidqqiy.
The
rumors are not true. There are rumors of a falling out between myself and
the Soviet Union. These too are untrue. The differences that exist are
differences of principle. There are rumors that the Soviet Union is going
to control the naval bases at Alexandria and Marsa Matruwh.
These also are untrue."
He
went on to talk about Hasan's visit to Moscow. He
had not succeeded in getting the main items we wanted. The Soviet price
was now 5.6 million rubles for each TU-22 and 250,000 rubles for each
T-62, roughly $8.4 million dollars and $375,000 dollars respectively,
and the Soviets had asked that even the ammunition be paid for in hard
currency.
I
left
the meeting wondering precisely what Sadiq
was
trying to achieve. Rumors in Egypt are frequently not what they
seem. Often they are manufactured and spread by the authorities to serve
some person or cause. I fancied GeneralSadiq's
"rumors" were of that sort. It was well known, certainly among the senior
officers of the armed forces, that the new Prime Minister, Dr.
`Aziyz Sidqiy favored close cooperation
with the Soviet Union. The Prime Minister had therefore become one
of Sadiq’s
targets. I concluded that Sadiq
himself
was spreading these rumors to underline his anti-Soviet credentials, and
was now seeking new adherents from the bad news of the Soviet terms of
sale.
March 19:
A morning meeting with Sadiq
and General Okunev.
Extraordinary news. Yesterday Okunev
and Soviet Ambassador Vinogradov
met the President. Okunev said
that Sadat
had told them:
-He
personally had instructed Prime Minister
Sidqiy to tell Moscow that Egypt
was ready to pay for arms in hard currency. That was why the Russians had
demanded it of Hasan.
-Egypt
was ready to pay in full, in hard currency, for the MIG-21s and
the M-500s (if the Soviets would sell them to us) but not for the
TU-22s.
-Instead
of buying the TU-22s, Egypt would be reinforced by Lightnings:
two squadrons from Saudi Arabia and one from Kuwait.
-We
badly needed the T- 62 tanks but could not afford them. It was possible
Libya
might pay for them, but there were still problems.
-Egypt
would pay for ammunition in hard currency.
-Egypt
was determined to replace the Soviet SAM crews. But as a gesture
we would relieve only 12 battalions, not the 18 stipulated
in Sadiq's
letter to Grechko.
Amazed,
Sadiq
could say only that he knew nothing of any of this and would have to contact
the President. After Okunev
had gone, Sadiq telephoned
Sadat.
I was beside him. The President confirmed Okunev's
account, adding that when he had agreed to pay for ammunition he meant
for the expansion of Egypt's own production facilities rather than
for ammunition itself.
It
was about 10:30 hours when Sadiq
put the phone down. He left almost at once for the airport, bound on a
scheduled trip to Saudi Arabia. I began the most immediate
task: the replacement of 12 Soviet air defense battalions. Suddenly the
President phoned. He told me to report at once, bringing with me the Vice
Minister, General Hasan.

At 12:30 hours we were
at the Giyzah residence. The President's National Security Adviser,
Hafiz
Isma`iyl,
was already there. At the President's request, Hasan
launched into a detailed account of the difficulties in Moscow.
The President listened without comment. Then he said: "I have been informed
there is considerable discussion with the armed forces, organized debate,
about relations with the Soviet Union. The men are being told by their
officers that the Soviet Union is insisting on payment in hard currency;
that a secret agreement has given the Soviet Union naval bases; and that
the Defense Intelligence Department wants to know the views of officers
and men on both points." He had learned this, he said, from a police
officer (he meant a member of the Secret Investigations Department) and
he produced the man from an anteroom to repeat the story. The man said
he had it from "one of his friends" in a military unit.
The
President said he wanted the following understood. Our friendship with
the Soviet Union was a strategic necessity. We had to maintain it.
It was our only card. It was one we needed to play soon. As for bases,
we would give facilities to the Soviet Union but never bases. Finally,
information revealed to the Armed Forces Supreme Council must on no account
be passed to, or discussed by, lower levels.
GeneralHasan
then left the meeting. I stayed on, but to talk of other matters. How we
were to get the weapons we needed remained unresolved.
(To be continued)
Next issue: The
tale of two allies.
|