WE LIVE PROUDLY OR DIE HONORABLY



 

 
 

 

March 23: With very short notice an Iraqi delegation under Vice President Saddam Husaynarrived in Cairo. Their decision to come, especially with so powerful a figure was significant. Behind the scenes, Saddam Husayn was the real strong man of Iraq. We hastily convened to decide our position on the points likely to be raised. Present were Vice President Mahmuwd Fawziy; National Security AdviserHafiz Isma`iyl; Minister of the InteriorMamduwh Salim; Foreign MinisterMuwrad Ghalib; myself; the Undersecretary for Foreign Affairs; and the Egyptian Ambassador toIraq.

Given the rivalry between Syria and Iraq, none of us wanted to do anything to damage relations with Syria, which was already sharing the burden of the battle. The Ambassador was inevitably, I suppose, keenest to advance toward cooperation and conciliation; most of the others were suspicious of Iraqi intentions. "Whatever they say, I don't think they want unity," one remarked. "I don't think they will send troops to the battle either. They are up to some party maneuver, that's all."

I urged we try. For me, Iraq meant 250 combat aircraft, four infantry divisions, and two armored divisions. "If we can guarantee even a part of that, it will add a new dimension to our forces," I said. Iraq would probably ask who would command any forces it might send to the Syrian front. We had to make it clear they should be under Syrian command. They might also say they would send troops only after the war began. We should oppose this. They would never arrive in time to be useful. Finally, Iraq might point to the weakness of Syria's air defense: would the Iraqi Air Force be destroyed by surprise attack if it were sent to the front before the battle? But I knew from my own discussions that Syria was ready to let the Iraqis build what air bases they liked on Syrian soil and install what equipment they liked to defend themselves.

The talks went round and round. Our delegation was instructed to concentrate on the help Iraq could offer the battle and to beware any step that might offend Syria; the Iraqis insisted their differences with Syria could be surmounted. The only positive outcome was Saddam Husayn's insistence that I visit Iraq as I had other countries, to see their forces for myself.

To run ahead of sequence, I finally went to Iraq at the end of May, the first official visit by a high-ranking Egyptian for years. (Sadat had been reluctant to let me go. His opinion of Iraq and its President, Ahmad Hasan al-Bakr, was no higher than his views of Hasan, Boumedienne or Husayn.) From May 26 until June 2, I toured the country from the Kurdish settlements in the north to the Shatt-al-`Arab in the south, scene of the border dispute with Iran. I saw every major military installation, and I met some of the thousands of Egyptian teachers, academics and technicians in Baghdad.
 

I returned to Cairo frankly thinking I had little to show for my time but conditional promises "The situation with the Kurds and with Iran must be quiet. " I had a pleasant surprise a few days later. Vice Minister of Defense, General `Abd al-Galiylfrom Iraqi GHQ turned up in Cairo. Saddam Husayn was going to France in mid-June and wanted to know what equipment we needed, so Iraq could buy it for us.

So once more we had relations with Iraq, however tinged with caution. We offered places in our staff colleges and training centers to their officers and enlisted men. And Iraq generously put £.7 million at our disposal in a London bank to cover urgent defense purchases in the West. The promised squadron of Hawker Hunters began to arrive in Egypt in March 1973.
 
 
 

Iraqi squadron of Hawker Hunters arriving in Egypt, March 1973.

Egypt's relations with Saudi Arabia were always mysterious. Even as Chief of Staff I was allowed no part in them, but remained a distant and frequently puzzled observer. Relations were left to the Ministers of War, but also  and to a degree one could never fathom to the President himself or his personal courier and emissary, Dr. Ashraf Marwan. Dealings were certainly brisk. I suppose they made well over 30 trips in my time as Chief of Staff. I never learned what happened at any of them.

The strangeness of the relationship was well indicated by the Lightnings. At the Arab Collective Defense Council, meeting in November 1971, it had been decided we should mobilize two squadrons of Lightnings from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. Back in my office, I was told Sadiq would deal with this. A few weeks later Sadiq informed me that the Saudis would not agree to sending pilots with the aircraft. Egypt would have to supply its own. I was told to send Egyptian pilots to train in Saudi Arabia before flying the aircraft back to Egypt. (Now, in March, it turned out that Sadat had told the Soviets we were doing it.) It was nonsensical. Trained pilots, not aircraft, were what we lacked. With 100 Soviet pilots already flying Egyptian aircraft for us, how could we spare 10-15 of our own men for Saudi Arabia? (And Sadat's assertion that Lightnings could substitute for the TU-22 was equal nonsense.) But the decision stood. On May 2, 1972 the first contingent of seven pilots and 33 mechanics set off for Saudi Arabia.
 
 
 

Above: Soviet made Tupolev Tu- 22 " Blinder"  medium range supersonic bomber.
Below: British made BAC Lightning single-seat interceptor fighter. The assertion that the
Tu-22 bombercould be substituted with a Lightning fighter was utterly nonsensical.
 

It was a waste of time. There were so many problems with the serviceability of the aircraft and the standards of instruction and administration that, after wasting almost a year, our pilots finally returned to Egypt. The Lightnings never came.

Relations with Saudi Arabia seemed unaffected, though. To dispose of the point: it was in July 1973 that I had a phone call from Marwan. Saudi Arabia was going to sign a contract on our behalf for Sea King helicopters and 32 Mirages. Marwannow said that the sum allocated for machine gun ammunition for the aircraft was excessive $35 million, he claimed-and had to be cut. I knew nothing about it. When I spoke to General Husniy Mubarak, the new Air Force Commander, he said he had not asked for any ammunition. We just looked at each other.

Two more surprises came in that same conversation. Marwan said that King  Faysal  had decided to give a helicopter as a present to Sadat. Would I please send pilots to fly it home. When I mentioned this to Mubarak, he said he had already sent men to inspect it. It was an Augusta Bell L-13 with a single motor and a landing skid. Mubarak thought Sadat would reject it as too modest.
 
 
 

  The promised Sea King helicopters; we never received them. 

Final surprise: "Henceforth," Marwan said, "all contacts between Egypt and Saudi Arabia will be directly between President Sadat and King Faysal and not through the two defense ministers."

"Why tell me," I asked. "Shouldn't you be telling the minister?"
"Sure," Marwan said. "I will when he gets back from abroad. I'm just telling you for your information."

What was going on? I never knew. What I do know is that we never received either the Sea King helicopters or the Mirages which Marwan spoke to me about.
 
 
 

NEXT EPISODE: CONFRONTATION WITH SADIQ


 

Vom kriege (On War). "ON STRATEGY IN GENERAL"

IF THIS VIEW IS NOT ADOPTED, OTHER MATTERS 
WILL BE INACCURATELY ASSESSED

 If we do not learn to regard a war, and the separate campaigns of which it composed, as a chain of linked engagements each leading to the next, but  instead succumb to the idea that the capture of certain geographical points or the seizure of undefended provinces are of value in themselves, we are liable to regard them as windfall profits. In so doing, and in ignoring the fact that they are links in a continuous chain of events, we also ignore the possibility that their possession may later lead to definite disadvantages. The mistake is illustrated again and again in military history. One could almost put the matter this way just as a businessman cannot take the profit from a single transaction and put it into a separate account, so an isolated advantage gained in war cannot be assessed separately from the overall result. businessman must work on the basis of his total assets, and in war the advantages and disadvantages of a single action could only be determined by the final balance.

By looking on each engagement as part of a series, at least insofar events are predictable, the commander is always on the high road to his goal. The forces gather momentum, and intentions and actions develop with a vigor that is commensurate with the occasion, and impervious outside influences.
 

Carl Von Clausewitz; Prussian Military Philosopher

 

 
 
 

 
 

PicoSearch
  PUBLISHED IN THE EGYPTIAN CHRONICLES BY A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION
GRANTED BY Lt.  GENERAL SA`D AL-DIYN AL-SHAZLIY
 

       All rights reserved including the right of reproduction in whole or parts or in any form to
"Al-SHAZLIY"  1980,The Crossing of the Suez. L.C.# 80-67107
 

Curriculum material copyrighted and  restricted solely for educational purposes
(upon permission of the author ) only for Egyptian/Arab private educational & Military lists .
For any additional information, please contact the Webmaster of the Egyptian Chronicles

CLICK BELOW FOR THE
    ORIGINAL ARABIC VERSION OF
"THE CROSSING OF THE SUEZ CANAL"
BY Lt.  GENERAL SA`D AL-DIYN AL-SHAZLIY



 
 
A.M.R.
© Copyright 1980
 
BACK TO MAIN PAGE
 
 
DESIGNED BY
© Copyright 1999
AL-Yawmiyat al-Misriyah
 

"We live proudly or die honorably."
  " IN MEMORY OF THE THOUSANDS OF EGYPTIAN AND SYRIAN SOLDIERS
         WHO FOUGHT THE 1973 RAMADAN WAR, A TRIBUTE TO THOSE WHO DIED IN DEFENSE OF THEIR HOMELAND  AND THE ARAB NATION "