| The truth was, we
had to rebuild our relationship with the Soviet Union. Even Sadat
realized
that. Through September, relations were at their lowest ebb. Then slowly
they begin to flow again. It was agreed that Prime Minister
Sidqqiy
would
go to Moscow in mid-October. Meanwhile, the Soviets began to explore
just how total the rift was. And the President realized how
insecure his regime might be.
October 4, 1972:
The Soviet authorities asked permission for three naval tank transports
to berth in Port Said harbor. They had based there only two months
before and, though they had been withdrawn with all other Soviet equipment,
they legally had the right to return. The five-year naval facilities agreement
which
Nasir had signed in 1968
had
neither expired nor been abrogated. But I assumed the Soviet request
was really to take the temperature before Sidqqiy
arrived in Moscow. I phoned the President, putting forward
Sidqqiy
's visit as a reason why we might agree. "OK," he said. "Our
agreement to grant them naval facilities is valid until March 1973. We
can grant permission within the terms of that. If Sidqqiy
's trip to Moscow does not succeed, I will terminate that agreement too
and ask them to leave." So the next day the inhabitants of Port
Said awoke to see familiar silhouettes once more alongside the mole.
October 12, 1845 hours: A rare evening
at home. The phone rang. Lieutenant General Shariyf,
Chief
Aide-de Camp to the President. A number of tanks have driven into
Cairo, ignoring military police signals. There is a real threat to
the President, Shariyf says,
because he is going to a meeting later this evening with members of the
Assembly. General Sadiq has
already been told. I sped to my HQ, Only to learn that military police
had already arrested the ringleader and taken him to Central District HQ.
I went on there. General Sadiq
had arrived a few minutes before, and in less than half-an-hour we were
joined by General `Abd al-Khabiyr,
Commander
of the Central District. The arrested officer was identified as Captain
`Aliy Husny `Iyd, commander of a mechanized company in
an armored brigade stationed ten miles or so east of Cairo.
Sadiq
questioned him, with Khabiyr
and I putting in questions from time to time. The captain's story:
"My
company was on alert against enemy airborne troops. I decided to train
my men with a preparedness exercise. When we had finished that, about 1600
hours, I thought we might drive to Sayydna al-Husayn
mosque for maghrib prayers. We left our vehicles in the square and
went in to pray. When we came out we were surprised to find military police
surrounding us and arresting us:"
At least it had the
merit of being unusual. But it was full of holes which `Iyd
was quite unable to bridge. Why did he have with him vehicles and men not
of his own company? Why had he not told his battalion commander of his
wish to exercise, so the usual security measures could have been taken?
Why had he crashed through the military police point on the outskirts of
Cairo, violating the standing order that no military vehicle or weapon
could enter
Cairo without a prior written order from GHQ?
Did he, finally, regard it as normal to go to his mosque in an armored
vehicle?
The captain's
followers seemed, by contrast, honestly confused. He had told them they
were on an exercise. They had set off in 12 armored personnel carriers.
When they reached Cairo military checkpoint, the first seven had sailed
through but the police had managed to halt the last five. The captain had
then led them at high speed through the streets of Cairo, radioing
confused and ambiguous orders. The commanders of four of the vehicles began
to have serious doubts and halted. When the captain reached the mosque
square with his fina three vehicles they had, as he said, gone inside to
pray
As his questioning
proceeded, it became fairly clew Captain `Iyd
was a religious maniac. He would break of his answers to recite the Qur'an,
then launch into fervent denunciations of the Egyptian way of life, people
forgetting their God, neglecting their religious obligations and so on.
(Captain `Iyd was subsequently committed
to a mental hospital.)
A worried General
Sadiq
soon departed, saying he was going to report to the President. Watching
him go, it seemed to me possible the President would recall my warning
of April 23 that if Sadiq
insisted on controlling those two key departments, I could not answer for
the security of the forces. I was correct.
October 16-18:
To everyone's relief
Sidqqiy's
mission to Moscow has been a great success. The Soviet's have promised
to supply one squadron of MIG-23s, but only to arrive in the last
quarter of 1973; one squadron of SU-20s, to arrive at the same time;
and, most important, a brigade of R-17E ground-to-ground missiles
(known in the West as SCUDS), with a range of almost 150 miles.
The delivery date of this will be fixed early next year. We have begun
to reconstruct the crucial alliance.
October 24:
A crucial meeting of the Armed Forces Supreme Council. The President
had ordered a meeting of the Armed Forces Supreme Council at his
Giyzah
residence
at 2100 hours. General Sadiq
then said he wanted a meeting of the Armed Forces Supreme Council beforehand,
in his office at noon. (It was also the day of my monthly meeting of field
and staff commanders; we had to break off at 1130 hours.)
The noon meeting with
Sadiq
lasted an hour. Almost every commander round the table spoke briefly of
the situation as he saw it, the state of his forces and in particular their
difficulties and problems.
Sadiq's
contribution, in summary, was: "All I want is that tonight you tell
the President the true situation. The President thinks I exaggerate your
problems. He wants to hear the true position from you." Everyone said
they would speak out.
From about 20 30
hours we began to gather at Giyzah. Promptly at 21 00 hours,
the President opened the meeting with a long address:
"My
meetings with the Soviet leadership in March 1971, October 1971 and February
1972 were at my request. My visit to Moscow in April 1972 was at the Soviets'
request. On my April 1972 visit, I told the Soviet leadership the following:
ONE: "The problem will never
budge politically unless we shift it militarily.
TWO: "It took the Soviet Union
six months to prepare and equip India for its war against Pakistan. I ask
you to do the same for Egypt. 1972 is an election year in the United States.
While that is on, no solid agreement can be made between yourselves and
the United States. Take advantage of the remaining months of 1972; supply
me with what I need; and then negotiate with the new administration from
a position of strength."
THREE: "I agree with your strategy
to help the reelection of Nixon. It will be
more fruitful dealing with him than with some new president whose eyes
are fixed on the need to retain power for another eight years."
"In May 1972 Marshal
Grechko
came. He attended the demonstration of the M-500 (MIG-25) and he
had with him a communiqué about his visit already drafted by the
Soviet
Central Committee. They wanted to negotiate with the Americans from
a position of strength, so I approved the statement. But I also gave
Grechko
a letter to deliver to the
Soviet leadership. I told them I did
want the M-500. I also wanted electronic warfare equipment. I made it clear
to them, too, that I would not agree to any Soviet unit staying in Egypt
unless it was wholly under Egyptian authority.
"On June 6,
I received a message from Mr. Brezhnev,
in which he said the situation vis-a-vis the United States remained
as before. I told the Soviet Ambasador that I wanted a reply to
the message I had sent via Marshal Grechko,
and I repeated what I had said in it.
"On July 6,
I was told the Soviet Ambassador had a reply and wanted to meet
me. I met him on July 8. But when the Ambassador read his
text it was vague and never even mentioned the message I had sent to the
Soviet leaders. After he had finished, I told the Ambassador:
"Your message is totally rejected. My decision is to end the service of
all Soviet advisers and units in Egypt, starting July 17."
"Before making that
decision public, I sent [Prime Minister] `Aziyz
Sidqqiy
to Moscow to explain the situation and to suggest that a joint declaration
be issued covering what was happening.
Moscow did not agree; they
said it was a unilateral decision and therefore should be a unilateral
declaration. They still thought I was bluffing, despite `Aziyz
Sidqqiy
's assurances that I was not. From July 17, as all of you know,
my decision was carried out.
"On July 311 received
a message from Mr. Brezhnev. I deliberately
did not hasten to answer it. But on August 31 I did finally send my reply-ten
points.
"The Soviets asked
[Syrian] President Hafiz al -Asad
to help in improving relations between us. At his instigation, I agreed
to send Dr.
`Aziyz Sidqqiy to
Moscow once more, and I think his visit has had two positive results. The
first is that we have established relations with the Russians on a new
basis: cooperation as friends, but with absolute equality and freedom of
action. The seccond point is that the Soviet Union has agreed to supply
us with more weapons. [The President read out the list I have
already given.]
"By deciding delivery
dates the Soviet Union still holds the reins in their hands. But at least
they have demonstrated by this agreement a willingness to continue normal
supplies. That is very important. I told them in my last letter of August
31 that I would take October 31 as the date of decision on our future relations.
So the Soviets knew, when Sidqqiy
was in Moscow, that unless they changed their attitude I would cancel the
treaty of friendship between us and withdraw the facilities they enjoy
in our ports, all of which would mean our relations would then deteriorate
further."
May 1972,
President Nixon in Moscow conferring with
Soviet chairman Leonid Brezhnev about Détente.
On the Soviet Union's general position,
the President's remarks seemed self-contradictory to me:
| "Détente,
sealed between the Russians and Americans in Moscow at the May 20 summit,
is now the dominant strategy of the Soviet Union. The cold war between
the blocs is over, and detente will work for 20-25 years at least. But
detente means that small powers like us will be crushed. The Soviet Union
does not want us to go to war. They want us to reach a peaceful solution,
because they know war might drag them into confrontation with the Americans."
But he also said: "The Soviets are not sure we are going to fight. That
is why they are reluctant to give us weapons. At all my meetings with them,
the leadership has indicated this in so many indirect, insinuating ways:
When are you going to fight? When are you going to act like men and liberate
your lands?' At last they said that openly to Dr. `Aziyz
Sidqqiy.
If they were in our position, they said, they would fight to liberate their
country even if they had nothing but rifles. I am sure that, in private,
they put it even more bluntly." |
Yet the President
also
said the Russians had told Sidqqiy
that détente would never affect their relations with Egypt
and that Soviet policy was to continue to support Egypt and
to supply her with weapons.
He then turned to
the alternative to war: "As for a peaceful solution to the conflict
which faces us, my last proposals were very clear:
| ONE:
"We would declare a cease-fire during which Israel would withdraw its
troops from the vicinity of the Suez Canal; our forces would cross to the
east bank; and the canal would be reopened.
TWO:"The
cease-fire would last for six months. If we had reached no final solution
by then we would be free to end the cease-fire and resume the responsibility
of liberating our occupied territory. |
|