WE LIVE PROUDLY OR DIE HONORABLY

 

 
 

 

 


 
The first few days of Isma`iyl's tenure brought the only item of our preparations he oversaw: the building of our rival sand rampart on the west bank of the canal. Our decision to provide covering fire from the west bank meant-as Wasil had reminded the President at that traumatic Armed Forces Supreme Council meeting-that we needed a rampart of our own higher than the Israelis' as a firing platform. (We actually began building a sand barrier in late 1969 to counter the Israeli one started 8-10 months earlier. The higher they went with theirs, the higher we would go with ours, although theirs was always higher and more complete.) For some time before his dismissal Sadiq had been pressing without success for LE.23 million from the contingency funds to finish this.

Now, a few days after Isma`iyl's appointment, the cash was allocated. By the end of 1972 our engineers had built, not a continuous rampart, but 30 separate ramps along the five fronts, each about 70 feet high and containing almost 230,000 cubic yards of sand. Mammoth constructions, perfect firing platforms for our tanks and anti-tank guided weapons in the opening stages of the assault.

October 29, 1972, 1700 hours: Meanwhile the rumblings about Sadiq's dismissal began. We did not have to wait long for proof that his views were widely shared. General Sa`iyd al-Mahiy, Director of the Artillery Department, phoned to say that a young officer at the artillery school had publicly criticized the President. The commandant of the school had been explaining to the assembled young officers why Sadiq had been dismissed. (His text was a briefing hastily distributed bySadiq's successor.) "The President knows nothing of military matters," one of the young officers had said. Horror. But when an inquiry was hastily set up, the young man denied-I presume on prudent advice-that he had said it. His denial was accepted; the incident was gratefully closed. But far more serious rumblings were to come.

November 11, 17 45 hours: Summoned to the President at Giyzah. Joined by the Minister of the Interior, Mamduwh Salim, then by `Izzat Sulayman, Deputy Director of the National Intelligence Service. A plot has been uncovered.

The affair had begun a few days before, when a captain in the Defense Intelligence Department stumbled on something which made him suspicious of a particular group of officers. Instead of telling his superiors, he had gone straight to the President Sadat, having heard him, began to suspect the involvement of some Defense Intelligence Department staff in whatever was afoot, and turned to the National Intelligence Service to crack it. National Intelligence Service surveillance had confirmed that officers, some known to be pro-Sadiq, were meeting-and with such security that they could not learn what went on at the meetings. By now thoroughly suspicious, the President decided to strike at the group even before having a solid case. So here we sat, listening to`Izzat Sulayman lay out everything the National Intelligence Service has learned about the organization.

Even its name, "Save Egypt", proclaimed its naivete. The plain fact was that the group accepted Sadiq's views.

They too believed that a certain power was trying to push us into war while we were unprepared; that this would lead to destruction of our armed forces, to the fall of the regime, thence to political turmoil and so to the emergence of communism in Egypt and its spread throughout the Arab world.

I disagreed with the analysis. That was one cause of my difference with GeneralSadiq. But Sadiq and I had been friends for 30 years, since we were junior officers together. Not once had I doubted his courage or patriotism, and I did not doubt it now. I disapproved of what his adherents were doing; but I was morally certain Sadiq was not acting as an agent on anyone's behalf. So I listened sadly as President Sadat launched into a denunciation of Sadiq as a puppet in the hands of the Saudis. He was an agent of KingFaysal, Sadat said, accepting cash, gold, expensive gifts, and in return, carrying out Faysal's orders. Mamduwh Salim hastened to confirm what the President was saying. I sat silent, in no position to refute the details, but silently recalling the letter Sadat had sent to Faysal only a year before, asking Faysal  to treat Sadiq as if he were Sadat  himself. Had Faysaldone just that?

When the three of us left the President at 2200 hours, we were under orders to arrest and question all suspects. We went to the headquarters of the National Intelligence Service and there I stayed until 05 00 hours next morning when, having signed warrants for the arrest of military personnel involved, I left for my own office to have a couple of hours sleep before starting my normal day's work. The questioning was to be done by our military prosecutor, but in National Intelligence Service headquarters.

November 12: General Mihriz, Director of the Defense Intelligence Service, was dismissed by the President. As the National Intelligence Service interrogation wound on, more names were mentioned, more arrests of military personnel required. In the middle of it all, I now had to go to Kuwait for two days for an Arab Collective Defense Council meeting. (I will recount that later.)

November I5, afternoon: When I got back from Kuwait, the questioning of those linked to Save Egypt was still proceeding. (With the departure of General Mihriz, the process had transferred to Defense Intelligence Department headquarters.) And worse was to come. Late that evening, the military prosecutor asked me to issue warrants for the arrest of General `Abd al-Khabiyr, lately Commander of the Central District; Colonel `Umran, a divisional commander; Colonel Ahmad `Abd al-Wahhab, Chief of Staff of a division, and Lieutenant Colonel Mahmuwd `Isam,commander of a ranger group. Their names had been given by others, the prosecutor said; their involvement was almost certain. I gave my permission. They were arrested shortly after 0130 hours.

By now I was becoming alarmed. The situation looked more serious than I had first thought. I imposed strict security measures, including an immediate ban on all military movements.

November 16, afternoon: To Defense Intelligence Department headquarters. To my amazement, I was presented with the complete confessions of General `Abd al-Khabiyr and Lieutenant Colonel `Adil.

It was hard to take the sight of `Abd al-Khabiyr, a colleague and senior commander only a fortnight before, under arrest and interrogation. His confession was what I would have expected of a brave man: he claimed full responsibility in an obvious effort to save the others. Quietly, I asked him: "Is what you signed correct, and made of your own free will?" Equally quietly, he replied: "Yes." I beckoned the military prosecutor into another room. "I can see General`Abd al-Khabiyr is still in good shape," I said. "But I must impress upon you that it is absolutely forbidden to use force or threats. Over and above that, he and all the others are to be treated with respect and dignity." The prosecutor said he could give me his assurance that he was against any sort of violence or threats; and that none had been used to extract the confessions.

I read the statements again. They were damning. The organization had planned to strike the previous week, on November 9. It had been my daughter's wedding day; and they had known that everyone who mattered, including the President, would be at the ceremony that evening. They had planned to arrest us all in one operation. Only when they had learned how heavily guarded the ceremony would be had they postponed the coup.

As it happened, when I left Defense Intelligence Department headquarters that afternoon, I was bound for another wedding, that of Major `Abd al-Mun`im al-Huny, one of the Libyan Revolutionary Council whom I had met with Qadhdhafiy. The ceremony was at the Shooting Club out by the Pyramids. President Sadat was already there, and I drew him into a corner and told him of the latest confessions. He left shortly afterwards, his host accompanying him downstairs. Suddenly the room was buzzing with people calling out: "The President wants you." By the time I had pushed my way downstairs he had gone, leaving orders I was to follow him. Without even letting my wife know, I set off for Giyzah, catching the President at the door of the residence. For half-an hour we paced back and forth on the steps while the President thought aloud.

His real worry was Sadiq. Sadiq's name had not been mentioned by the conspirators, but it was clear his thinking dominated their actions. Three questions followed. How subversive were Sadiq's views? How many officers shared them? And where were they? (The President, after all, had relied heavily on Sadiq's personal advice in approving the most senior postings.)

"He was deceiving me about who to choose," the President said, pacing up and down. "Planting his own men, eliminating rivals." He turned to me: "What is your opinion of . . ." and named an officer exiled by Sadiq as a military attaché in Europe. He was a good soldier, I replied. (He had in fact been the armored division commander whomSadiq had not wanted to trust with 100 T- 62 tanks.) "Bring him back," the President said. "Tomorrow, bring him back."

I thought his impulsiveness did credit to his heart but not to his head. "Mr. President," I said, "if you will permit me, I would advise postponing that for a time."

"Why?" Sadat asked.

"General Sadiq accused anyone who disagreed with him of being a communist," I said. "I myself suffered from his comments and insinuations. But if, now, we start bringing people back it will be misinterpreted in the armed forces. Are we rehabilitating them, or bringing them back as suspected conspirators?"

The President nodded: "I think you are right. Let us postpone it."

We turned to the additional security measures to be taken in Egypt. When I left him, still pacing the steps, I had my orders. It was another hour before I could drive out to bring my wife home from the wedding.
 

 


 
NEXT EPISODE:  Hopes for the Future

 

 

 

 
Physical casualties are not the only losses incurred by both sides in the course of a military engagement: their moral strength is also shaken, broken and ruined. In deciding whether or not to continue the engagement it is not enough to consider the loss of men and guns; one also has to weigh the loss of order, courage, confidence, cohesion, and plan. The decision rests chiefly on the state of morale, which, in cases where the victor has lost as much as the vanquished, has always been the single decisive factor.

The ratio of physical loss on either side is in any case hard to gauge in the course of an engagement; but this does not apply to loss of morale. There are two main indicators of this. One is loss of the ground on which one has fought; the other is the preponderance of enemy reserves. The faster one's own reserves have shrunk in relation to the enemy's, the more it has cost to maintain the balance. That alone is palpable proof of the enemy's superior morale, and it seldom fails to cause some bitterness in a general a certain loss of respect for the forces he commands. But the main point is that soldiers, after fighting for some time, are apt to be like burned-out cinders. They have shot off their ammunition, their numbers have been diminished, their strength and their morale are drained, and possibly their courage has vanished as well. As an organic whole, quite apart from their loss in numbers, they are far from being what they were before the action; and thus the amount of reserves spent is an accurate measure on the loss of morale. 

As a rule, then, loss of ground and lack of fresh reserves are the two main reasons for retreat

There may, however, be others, which we do not wish to exclude or minimize, having to do with

 

 
 
 
 the interdependence of the parts or with the overall plan. Every engagement is a bloody and destructive test of physical and moral strength. Whoever has the greater sum of both left at the end is the victor.

In military engagement, the loss of morale has proved the major decisive factor. Once the outcome has been determined, the loss continues to increase, and reaches its peak only at the end of the action. This becomes the means of achieving the margin of profit in the destruction of the enemy's physical forces which is the real purpose of the engagement. Loss of order and cohesion often makes even the resistance of individual units fatal for them. The spirit of the whole is broken; nothing is left of the original obsession with triumph or disaster that made men ignore all risks; for most of them danger is no longer a challenge to their courage, but harsh punishment to be endured. Thus the tool is weakened and blunted at the first impact of the enemy's victory, and is no longer suitable for countering danger with danger.


 
 
Carl Von Clausewitz; Prussian Military Philosopher
 

 
 

 

 
 

 

PicoSearch
  PUBLISHED IN THE EGYPTIAN CHRONICLES BY A SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION
GRANTED BY Lt.  GENERAL SA`D AL-DIYN AL-SHAZLIY
 

       All rights reserved including the right of reproduction in whole or parts or in any form to
"Al-SHAZLIY"  1980,The Crossing of the Suez. L.C.# 80-67107
 

Curriculum material copyrighted and  restricted solely for educational purposes
(upon permission of the author ) only for Egyptian/Arab private educational & Military lists .
For any additional information, please contact the Webmaster of the Egyptian Chronicles

CLICK BELOW FOR THE
    ORIGINAL ARABIC VERSION OF
"THE CROSSING OF THE SUEZ CANAL"
BY Lt.  GENERAL SA`D AL-DIYN AL-SHAZLIY



 
 
A.M.R.
© Copyright 1980
 
BACK TO MAIN PAGE
 
 
DESIGNED BY
© Copyright 1999
AL-Yawmiyat al-Misriyah
 

"We live proudly or die honorably."
  " IN MEMORY OF THE THOUSANDS OF EGYPTIAN AND SYRIAN SOLDIERS
         WHO FOUGHT THE 1973 RAMADAN WAR, A TRIBUTE TO THOSE WHO DIED IN DEFENSE OF THEIR HOMELAND  AND THE ARAB NATION "