This
week the French President, Jacques Chirac, signaled his support for a ban
on the wearing of openly ‘religious symbols’ in state schools. While Chirac
has tried to publicly argue that he has taken a neutral policy stance and
that such a measure is against all religious symbols, it has been widely
recognised that this policy is in reference to the wearing of headscarves
by Muslim girls. Chirac has urged the French parliament to pass the law
before the commencement of the new academic year in September 2004. Justifying
this policy position, Chirac made reference to the underlying principles
of the constitution, arguing that secularism itself was being undermined
by the encroachment of religion, and should be protected to ensure national
cohesion.
However
the debate surrounding this issue goes much deeper than a perceived threat
to the secular nature of France from Muslim women in hijab, or indeed an
unease over the growing number of Muslims within the country displaying
their ideologically affiliation. Fundamentally the crux of the matter revolves
around the status and future course of Muslims living within Europe: will
the Muslims fully integrate into Western society, adopting their political
and cultural norms; will they live in isolation in ghettos, or will they
try and challenge the precepts of the societies in which they now find
themselves living in? Policymakers currently fear Muslims across Europe
becoming ‘radicalised’, particularly by international events and the current
wars taking place in Palestine and Iraq.
As
part of a broader attempt to seize the political initiative and address
such matters head on, the French government has been seeking to establish
its own standardised version of Islam. According to the French Interior
Minister, Muslims living in France must conform to the principles of the
secular constitution and practice Islam within the framework of the France’s
current socio-political climate, particularly its staunch secularism that
is enshrined constitutionally. Hence the issue of headscarves can be seen
in a broader perspective: Muslims would have to willingly conform to laws
such as the ban on headscarves in state schools.
In
addition to this, plans are currently underway to create a French Islamic
body that will regulate all masjids within the country, as well as recruiting
pliant newly trained Imam’s to pass fatwa upon issues concerning ‘French
Muslims’, within the aforementioned framework, akin to the Turkish Directorate
of Religious Affairs. A number of prominent ‘Islamic’ institutions in France
have argued that such measures are welcome development, especially due
to the perceived growth in ‘radical Islam’ during the 1990s, as well as
the after effects of 11 September. The rector of France’s largest masjid
in Paris has argued in October that Muslims living in France must accept
the fundamental principles upon which the French republic is built, notably
secularism and democracy. If Muslims wish to discuss or partake in political
activities, then they are at liberty to do so providing that they choose
from amongst the current French political parties, and have no reference
to any form of ‘political Islam.’
As
part of a pan-European effort to create versions of Islam compatible with
European society, a number of European governments, not just in France,
have moved towards the idea of establishing official state control of Islam,
masjids, and Islamic education, either directly or through government approved
proxies. Unlike the confrontational approach that France has historically
taken to other creeds it encountered since its colonial heyday, the British
have taken a more hands off approach. For example when Tony Blair’s New
Labour entered office in 1997 they set about establishing a group from
amongst the Muslims - the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), to assess the
current political trends amongst the Muslim populace. A darker side to
this policy was for this group to act as the official mouthpiece and go
between of New Labour with the wider Muslim community in Britain.
One
may argue that the current battle against Islam, disguised internationally
as the war on terrorism and radicalism, has a longer reach than thought,
with European governments now working to introduce an alternative ‘moderate’
versions of Islam that agree with the present socio-political climate operating
within their respective national boundaries. The banning of ‘religious
symbols’ in French state schools does not begin or end with Muslim women
wishing to wear headscarves. European governments, to varying degrees,
are seeking to integrate Muslim communities into the wider mainstream on
a more comprehensive level than they have pursued previously.
This
current climate creates opportunities and dangers. With President Chirac’s
public stance on the issue of headscarves, the Muslim community is not
simply forced to address this issue, but required to take an active stance
in opposition to this, and the wider process of assimilation in France
and across Europe. This can be effectively done by deepening our own study
of Islam, and rethinking new and imaginative ways in which to convey the
Deen to European society at large. The comprehensive nature of Islam cannot
be undermined through individuals entranced by the ideology and life-style
that prevails in the West, nor can it be reinterpreted by such individuals
to suite the whims of any liberal secular polity. A clear message of the
incompatibility of Islam with the intellectual and political philosophy
of liberal secularism needs to be articulated more clearly and succinctly.
In tandem with this, Muslim communities across Europe must begin to re-evaluate
their status and position in Western society. It is no longer acceptable
to remain here as passive communities simply looking for economic improvement,
cut off from the wider struggle that engages us.
©
Khalid and Hakan 2003
|