As
soon as the French army had been forced to leave the country in September
1801, the British officers began to find that their association with
the Turks was by no means an unqualified success. The interests of the
two nations had been identical in driving Bonaparte out of Egypt,
but that being accomplished, the divergence of their points of view became
daily more apparent.
The
Turks very naturally wished to regain control in their province Egypt,
which meant that they desired to crush the independent spirit of the Mamluwk
chieftains whose authority was once recognized by the Egyptians but under
these new circumstances was seriously undermined.
The
British Government now made representations to the Porte (al-Bab
al-`Aliy), urging a tolerant treatment of the Mamaliyk
but in spite of this the Turkish admiral, having invited a number of these
chieftains to a fête (feast) upon his flagship, treacherously fired
upon them while they were coming to him in open boats, and killed or captured
them all. General Hely Hutchinson, the British commander, was furious
at this outrage, which had taken place almost under his eyes; and as a
result of his protest the prisoners were handed over to his care. At the
same time, the Turkish general in Cairo arrested as many of the
remaining chieftains as he could lay hands on; but the British forced him
to give them up. Not long after this, Khusruw Pasha, with
7000 Turks, attacked a Mamluwk force of 800 men commanded by two
famous chieftains, `Uthman al-Bardiysiy and
Muhammad
al-'Alfiy. However, his large force was utterly routed, and the`Uthmanliy
(Ottoman)
hold on Egypt was thereby greatly diminished.
Muhammad`Aliy
now began to realize that he was fighting on the losing side, for the Mamaliyk
had every reason to be confident both in their own strength and in the
support of the British; and he therefore showed an inclination to abandon
the Turkish cause. In March 1803, however, the British army
evacuated the country, taking with them to England the Mamluwk chieftain
al-'Alfiy,
who was to consult the Home Government as to the best method of reestablishing
control over Egypt under Mamluwk rule, with English supervision.
Muhammad`Aliy, therefore, was left to decide which side to
take; and it was not long before he showed in which direction he believed
his best interests to lie.
About
six weeks after the departure of the British army, the entire Albanian
force in Egypt, commanded by Tahir Pasha, to whom Muhammad
`Aliy
was lieutenant, came to blows with the Turkish Governor, Khusruw
Pasha, in regard to their pay. They seized the Citadel at Cairo, and
from this eminence bombarded the Governor in his palace in the al-'Izbakiyah,
a low-lying district at that time near the western outskirts of the city.
Khusruw
managed
to escape by river to Dumiyat (Damietta); and Tahir
was
proclaimed Governor in his stead. Less than a month later he, in his turn,
found himself unable to pay his troops; and by one of those remarkable
maneuvers, of which we have already noticed two previous instances, Muhammad
`Aliy managed to obtain the chief command, after Tahir
mysteriously died.

Now,
having all the Albanians at his back, he attacked the remainder of the
Turkish army, and soon afterwards made an alliance with the Mamaliyk
under al-Bardiysiy. The Porte (al-Bab al-`Aliy)
then appointed a new Governor of Egypt, a certain Ahmad
Pasha; but Muhammad `Aliy of course refused to recognize
him. No sooner had the unfortunate Turk arrived at his official residence
in the middle of Cairo, than the Albanians from the Citadel and
the Mamaliyk from the west bank of the Nile attacked him and made
him prisoner. Then they marched on Dumyat (Damietta), and
received the surrender also of the fugitive Khusruw Pasha.
Muhammad
`Aliy, on his return to Cairo, made al-Bardiysiy Shaykh
al-balad
(tiltle equivalent to a mayor of a city), and approved
the appointment of a nominal Turkish Waliy (Governor) whose
authority was negligible.
The
appointment of this representative of the Porte (al-Bab al-`Aliy)
was regarded by Muhammad `Aliy simply as a means of holding
the post open for himself, as soon as he should have opportunity to bring
his authority before the notice of the Porte (al-Bab al-`Aliy)
; for he now aimed at nothing less than the complete control of Egypt.
He had no intention of remaining in alliance with the Mamaliyk when
once his own position was secure; and he felt that his policy should be
directed towards rapprochement with Turkey.
In
the spring, an open rupture occurred between him and the Mamluwk chieftains,
owing, as usual, to a question of the payment of the troops; and on
March 12, 1804, Muhammad `Aliy attacked al-Bardiysiy
in his palace and drove him out of Cairo. The Cairenes and Albanians
then invited Khuwrshid Pasha, the Turkish Governor
of Alexandria, to assume the governorship of their city; but this
individual, wishing to be secure against the domination of Muhammad
`Aliy's troops, introduced a regiment of al-Magharibah
(North Africans) into the city, stationing them in the Citadel, and thereby
incurred the Albanian's furious displeasure.
About
a year later, therefore, Muhammad `Aliy persuaded the Cairenes
to depose Khuwrshid and to nominate himself as Governor
of Cairo, Khuwrshid very naturally refused
to recognize any nomination not confirmed by the Sultan,
and promptly turned the guns of the Citadel upon Muhammad `Aliy's
forces in the town below. The energetic Albanian replied by dragging his
cannons up to the summit of the Muqattam hills, which dominated
the Citadel, and meanwhile he sent an embassy post-haste to Istanbul asking
for the official deposition of his enemy. The document arrived in Cairo
on July 9, 1805, and a Turkish force was sent to restore order. Khuwrshid
then surrendered, and Muhammad `Aliy assumed the governorship,
having attained this exalted position at the early age of thirty-six.

| Description
de I'Egypte: Un recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont été
faites en Egypte pendant l'expédition
de l'armée
française
(20 vols. Paris 18og-28; 24 vols. Paris 1821-29).
D.
A. Cameron.
Egypt in the Nineteenth Century (London 1898).
Napoleon
I. Memoirs (tr. Somerset De Chair, London 1948).
Napoleon
I and Louis Alexandre Berthier.
An Account of the French Expedition
in Egypt (with Sir William Sidney Smith's letters; Leeds 1800).
L.
Louis de Boisey. Bonaparte au Caire (Paris 1799).
F.
Charles-Roux.
Bonaparte, gouverneur d'Egypte (Paris 1936).
Christian
Cherfils.
Bonaparte et l'Islam (Paris 1914).
P.
G. Elgood.
Bonaparte's Adventures in Egypt (London 1931).
Abd
al Rahman Ibn Hasan Al Jabarti ( Gabarti). Merveilles biographiques
et historiques (tr. Chefik Mansour Bey, Abdulaziz Kali Bey, Gabriel
Nicolas kalil Bey and Iskander Ammoun Effendi, 9 vols. Cairo 1886-1896).
Courier
de I'Egypte (Cairo 1798-1801).
Dominique
Vivant Denon. Travels in Upper and Lower Egypt ( 2 vols. London
1802).
M.
F. Rousseau.
Kléber
et Menou en Egypte . . . (Paris 1900).
Sir
Robert T. Wilson. History of the British Expedition to Egypt (London
1802).
"Carlos
Bey."
A Non-Military Journal (London 1863).
A
Faithful Journal of the Late Expedition to Egypt, by a private on board
the Dictator (London 1805).
R.
and G. Cattan.
Mohamed Aly et I'Europe . . . (Paris 1950).
F.
Charles-Roux.
L'Egypte de 1801 a 1882 (Paris 1936).
Shafik
Ghurbal.
The Beginnings of the Egyptian Question and the Rise of Mehemet
Ali . . . (London 1928).
Felix
Mengin.
Histoire de l'Egypte sous le gouvernement de Mohammed Aly
(2 Vols. Paris 1823).
P.J.Vatikiotis.
The
History of Egypt , The John Hopkins University press ( Baltimore
1976).
M.Rifaat
Bey. The Awakening of Modern Egypt . Longmans and Green Co.
Ltd..
(London
1947). |
|